Asthma and Allergies: Another Part of The Big Lie

We observed with interest the announcement of the new bronchial thermoplasty "treatment" performed in a hospital as an outpatient three times over three days. Note number one was that it was stated that this treatment is not always effective (surprise, surprise) and at the end of the bobble-fest there was a much too short whisperation that "the procedure does not come without some risk", of course. Hells bells, just simply visiting a hospital invokes a risk of catching a bacterial infection that can result in permanent afflictions and even death. Then they want to stick hot pipes (which may well be contaminated with bacteria, viruses, and who knows what) down into our bronchial passageways as a form of "treatment"? Geez Loueez... Note number two was that as the medical "ex-spurt" wrapped up his spiel, the news commentator, aka bobble head, astutely (surprisingly) asked the logical obvious question as to what else could be done to alleviate the consequences of asthma, to which the "spurt" did (surprisingly) respond that the underlying problem of asthma was inflammation and that if you should "fix the inflammation and that might fix the asthma" (must have caught him off guard, he told the truth rather than say take drugs for it...).

Before we address the recommended solutions for asthma and allergies, we must back up all the way to conception; yeh, pregnancy, prenatally, before birth, to point out the number one cause of asthma and allergies. Pregnant women should NOT NOT NOT be injected with any kind of vaccine (and any female that might ever become pregnant should minimize innocuous inoculations throughout life, starting at birth).

First, aside from causing astma and allergies, vaccines are associated with miscarriages and stillbirths (just check the VAERS database for all of the miscarriages that occurred right after injections of the H1N1 vaccine, which just happened to be strongly recommended by the scurrilous health agencies), as well as deformities and numerous diseases, so aside from asthma and allergies, right there is a good reason to avoid vaccines during (and before) pregnancy. Here is a direct link to our post on the subject, which also has a link to the VAERS database information -- tell everyone, pass it on...


Secondly, vaccines are admitted and documented to at least wreck, but also to even completely destroy, the immune system of the human body. The adjuvants and numerous toxins in vaccines clandestinely (you don't KNOW it, you can't FEEL it) over-stimulate the immune system as much as tenfold, by a factor of ten. For a clear analogy to remember and pass along to everyone you know, consider that instead of having a couple of cups of coffee in the morning, try having TWENTY cups of coffee after you get up, and be sure to load all that coffee up with sugar, cream, and how about some artificial sweetener that just happens to be a poison (kind of like the sugar and food additives they dump into vaccines). Does that make ANY sense? Would you do that willingly, knowingly? Again, remember this analogy and tell everyone... After the repeated over-revving of the immune system through the barrage of vaccinations that a child is subjected to, the immune system eventually begins to wear out and all types of immune disorders begin to surface; the list of immune disorders is much too long to insert here, but realize that just about any sickness, malady, chronic condition, or disease that you can think of is the result of a weakened immune system, at least in part if not wholely. The major point of this one point about asthma is to realize and remember that inflammation (which the aforementioned medical "ex-spurt" inadvertently admitted caused asthma) is a known, proven, documented immune disorder, which is the result of a weakened immune system, which is the result of a barrage of vacuous vaccinations, innocuous inoculations, shoddy shots, bad jabs, needlessly needling...

Thirdly, asthma and allergies are the result of both overactive immune systems and also weakened immune systems. Therefore, the simple correlation is that since vaccines radically over-rev the immune system and eventually weaken and destroy it, vaccines therefore induce asthma and allergies. A simple logical fact, but do "they" point that out? No, and they would somehow deny this plain simple hidden truth if asked. That is called hypocrisy, and remember the "Hypocritical Oath".

We are realizing that the topic of asthma and allergies is much too extensive to address here in a blog post, and have decided that this must instead be the subject of a webpage on our main WisBits website. We will finish compiling pertinent information and will then establish this under the "Illness and Disease" category. In the interim, we have started to address the subject of building immunity on our main WisBits website, just click on this link to go there if interested. Check back from time to time, we will advise here on our blog when we have implemented the asthma and allergies webpages on our main site.

We must close at this point by warning that "procedures" and drugs are not the answer to fixing the problems of allergies and asthma, as those efforts only temporarily treat the symptoms of the condition and do not in any way attempt to actually fix the root of the problem. Avoidance of further wrecking the immune system is a good start, then building back up the immune system is the right direction to head, noting that drugs for allergies further wreck your immune system, all a part of the intentionally built-in "rebound effect" of all pharmaceutical drugs, great for profits of the sick care industry, but not so good for the resultant weakened, sickened, and diseased populace. Be wary, beware, inform everyone...

Osteoporosis is found to be a Result of Aging Factors, NOT Estrogen Loss

If you know of anyone that is or may be affected by osteoporosis (or even the phony bogus "diagnosis" of ostopenia which mainstream med is now needlessly "treating" with drugs) you need to inform them of new research that concludes that the bone loss condition is due to the "age-related mechanism" of oxidative stress (aka "OS"). Further, whereas the estrogen/androgen loss decreases the bodies defenses against this oxidative stress in the bone, the actual root cause of bone loss is the resultant oxidative stress and not directly (only in a roundabout manner) the loss of estrogen. Consequently, this research delineates a shift away from the long standing views of the condition and the treatments for it. Preventing the oxidative stress prevents the bone loss, negating the need for the controversial estrogen replacement therapy, and of course the pharmaceutical drugs pushed by drug companies.

If you would like to view a brief technical abstract about the research, click on this link.

If you would like to view extended technical information about the research, click on this link.

If neither of the above, the following statement from the abstract pretty much sums it up: "This emerging evidence provides a paradigm shift from the 'estrogen-centric' account of the pathogenesis of involutional osteoporosis to one in which age-related mechanisms intrinsic to bone and oxidative stress are protagonists"...

Note that some of the major causes for increased oxidative stress and therefore osteoporosis -- at any age, noting that bone loss starts in the 30's -- are environmental toxins, toxins in vaccines, poor (or even good) diet that results in vitamin/mineral deficiencies, smoking, alcohol consumption, over the counter "medications", and oddly enough -- you guessed it -- pharmaceuticals, by design of course. Note that oxidative stress is not only responsible for osteoporosis, but also many other diseases such as hypertension, cancer, diseases of the eye, Parkinson's, cardiovascular diseases, Alzheimer's, fragile X syndrome, chronic fatigue syndrome, and on an on...

We do not mean to infer that you should begin countering oxidative stress until after age 30 -- it should begin at birth, or actually prenatally...

Note that, terminology-wise, "free radicals" are involved in oxidative stress, which is often abbreviated to "oxidation", and "anti-oxidants" are known to fight free radicals in repairing the damage of oxidative stress.

We have a section on oxidation, free radicals, and antioxidants to combat them, therefore combating oxidative stress, osteoporosis, and as a bonus all of the aforementioned diseases. This is a link to our webpage on the main WisBits website regarding our advice on free radicals and antioxidants. We provide normal, healthy, natural solutions to the problem of oxidative stress and disease, as opposed to the proven and even admitted damaging pharmaceutical drugs.

POINT. Consider, and always remember this, and warn everyone, that in the case of osteoporosis, mainstream medicine and of course the eagerly duplicitous drug companies had it all wrong. Surprise, surprise...

Diagnose Normal Condition as Disease, Treat it with Drug that Causes Disease

If physicians talked into a device that converted their lies to the truth, about "diagnosing" a newly classified normal natural condition of the human body as a supposed disease, here is how it would go: "Hey, you got what we have started calling "ostopenia", and it's a normal part of aging, and it's not a disease, nor is it in any way actually debilitating, and we just dreamed up the word to categorize women that are on the safe side of NOT having osteoporosis, and since we went to all the trouble of inventing a name for a natural condition that's unproblematic, hey, we concocted a deleterious drug that won't be at all beneficial in any way because there is no real problem that you should take this drug for, especially because you are in such excellent health, and even though this unneeded drug will induce other illnesses and diseases through the intentionally built-in side effects, we got medications for those problems too, so pretty soon you won't be so damned healthy any more, just dependent on our "sick care" drugs until you die an early unnatural death because of all them drugs..."

We hope that our rendition of what really happened is amusing, because the truth is, it is not at all funny. The situation that the aforementioned describes is reality. Drug companies and doctors delineated the difference between normal bone thinning and abnormal bone thinning, aka osteoporisis, and for some reason decided to give this non-condition the name of ostopenia -- wallah, that allows them to classify it as a "condition". A condition for which they now convince completely normal healthy women to take a drug for this non-existent condition. A drug which has no benefit (because there is no actual problem), but of course the drug is admitted to inflict a side effect disorder (entirely contradictory to it's supposed benefit) known such as osteonecrosis of the jaw, also know as "death of bone" or "jawbone death". Other side effects associated with the useless, un-needed drug just happen to be esophageal cancer, atrial fibrillation, hypocalcemia (a blood calcium deficiency), eye inflammation leading to blindness, and of course all of the typical standard so-what silly little ole inconsequential things like ulcers, adverse skin reactions, renal failure, and default run of the mill liver damage.

You don't believe this do you? You think this is an April Fool's joke? Well, it ain't April and we ain't in Kansas anymore. So, here is a link to an NPR article that confirms that we are not making this up, as certifiably insane as it all sounds. A Mayo Clinic article provided confirmation of the admission of the aforementioned osteonecrosis "side effect".

Next time you dare to wander into the lion's den and are told you have a "condition" that you have never heard of which doesn't make any sense, be very skeptical.

In the interim, will someone out there please get infuriated about this, pass it along -- they could be doing this to your Mother, your Sister, your Wife, your Daughter, your lover, your friend...

Footnote: as opposed to our "if they told the truth, this is how it would sound" rendition above, we wonder just what in the heck they actually say to dance around the truth and convince a healthy person to take a drug that they don't need for a non-existent condition they don't even have which will induce the actual disease that they don't have. Sounds like a situation for an "expose" where a female reporter with a hidden camera visits a doc that is known to pull this trick on women, just to see how they manage to word the deception. Where is "60 Minutes" on this???

Pharmaceuticals can kill you even if you don't take them.

Pharmaceuticals can kill you and your family even if you or your family do not (intentionally) have anything to do with pharma drugs (but, they are in the "water supply"*).

First we should explain that we are acquiescing to a suggestion that we separately expand upon some information that originally was mostly a side example that we included in another post. The suggestion was that we isolate that singular topic by itself mostly for the sake of emphasis but also for clarification and elaboration, lest the importance of the ("too succinctly stated") matter be lost within the ("long winded, boring") post, which might well result in the point being skipped over by many (really? was the other post that bad?). Anyway, be aware that you may have seen this tidbit before, but not in this much detail.

Surely most everyone should be aware that it is admitted that pharmaceutical drugs kill well over 100,000 people every year -- that is, they kill people that ingest them via inducing adverse health/diseases. What many are unaware of, is that pharmaceutical drugs can kill you even if you do not ingest any, and never have.

One recent example. On Thanksgiving Day, a family, including the elderly, children, an unborn baby/pregnant Mother, were cruelly massacred by a family member, supposedly without reason, but clearly premeditated. The killer that murdered his family was known to use a deadly mind-numbing cocktail of the anti-psychotic and anti-depressant pharmaceutical drugs Ativan, Chronumet, Seroquel, and Atenolol.

A less recent example that everyone should still remember. A mother of five young children, while taking a psycho-pharmacological cocktail which included "super high doses" of Haldol, Effexor, and Wellbutrin, methodically drowned each of her five children in the bathtub.

An example from a decade ago and what you probably didn't know is that the "leader" of the killers in the Columbine school shooting was taking the prescription anti-depressant Luvox. Bet you didn't know that, it was kept quiet, like so many similar incidents where Big Media suppresses that information to please their advertisers, the drug companies that profit from these killer drugs.

Rather than ramble on with a gruesome long list of examples like these, we will simply note that almost all of the massacres over the past decade are said to have had one thing in common: that they were committed by people taking drugs like Prozac, Zoloft, Luvox, Paxil or similar prescription anti-depressant or anti-psychotic pharmaceutical drugs.

There is even a technical name established just for these drug-induced murders, "akathisia", defined as "mental and physical agitation that sparks self-destructive, violent behavior." Further, "they can also induce dissociative reactions, making those who take the drugs insensitive to the consequences of their behavior."

This is outrageous. Doctors prescribe these murderous drugs like candy to thousands of people that don't need them (a new study indicates the drugs are worthless for "mild" depression), endangering you and your loved ones.

The government bureaucracies, especially the corrupt puppet of the of Big Pharma, the U.S. FDA, will never do anything about this unless the populace speaks out about the needless widespread prescribing of these drugs, and likely not even then. However, the only way to hope to combat this problem is to make everyone aware of this ludicrous dilemma and then for everyone to speak out against it in every way possible.

*Footnote. Just because you and yours and most everyone else is NOT intentionally ingesting pharmaceuticals that turn depressed or even normal people into rabid mad dogs that kill anyone and everyone, that does not mean that "you all" may not unintentionally be ingesting these dangerous murder-evoking pharmaceutical drugs. A plethora of scientific research study reports all agree that the water supply, whether municipally "treated" (aka MIS-treated) water supplies, as well as aquifers and other "natural" sources of drinking water (artesian wells, springs, lakes, etc.) all are now tainted with HUNDREDS of pharmaceutical drugs. We observe that the bureaucratic hypocrites try to push this off onto drugees peeing out the drugs and that the "wastewater" gets into the the other water supplies, but we strongly suspect that there is a "Johnny Appleseed" of Big Pharma going about sprinkling drugs into any and every place possible. And, we forsee that this footnote will culminate in yet another "suggestion" that we also transform this sub-topic into it's own separate expanded topic. Well, we already have on the main WisBits website, at least to some extent, but we admit that it needs a little work -- meanwhile, here is a link to that webpage (note that it starts out on the topic of "hydration", but that the second half addresses "water quality".

Rebound Effect of Pharmaceuticals

In addition to the "cumulative affect" of pharmaceuticals mentioned in previous posts, we thought we should also address an entirely different negative effect of pharma drugs because we have found that very few people are aware of the "rebound effect". Many have actually experienced the rebound effect, but most are still simply unaware of even what it is and just why it happens. Most of all, everyone needs to be informed, because it can not only make people dependent on and addicted to pharmaceuticals, but it can also have dire consequences, particularly with anti-psychotic and anti-depressant drugs. Note that the "Thanksgiving Day killer" that murdered his family was on anti-psychotic and anti-depressant pharmaceutical drugs Ativan, Chronumet, Seroquel, and Atenolol. Also, realize that this drug-induced massacre was NOT an isolated incident, that this has happened before, and that it is more like a pattern than an incident... The government bureaucracy, the FDA, will never do anything about this -- the only way to combat the problem is to make everyone aware.

The rebound effect tricks many people into believing they can't do without a pharmaceutical drug. When the drug is withdrawn, the original problem returns, but the symptoms are more severe than the original problem before initially administering the drug -- stated differently, more to the point, the drug actually makes the original problem worse once the drug is withdrawn.

Some examples. Cessation of sleep drugs induces "rebound insomnia" worse than the original sleep disorder of course. Discontinuation of drugs for high blood pressure induces "rebound hypertension" which is known to be quite hazardous to the health of the victim. Drugs for depression, e.g. antidepressants, which are of course advertised as "not habit forming", re-introduces depression either as time goes by, if the drug dosage is cut back, but especially when ingestion of an anti-depressant is terminated in which case an entirely unique set of negative symptoms other than depression can also develop (aka "SSRI discontinuation syndrome"). OK, the list is pretty long, but we will stop here, as you get the idea that if they have to name "syndromes" for rebound effects (effects which will eventually occur whether the drug is stopped or not), then the use of pharmaceuticals should be viewed as the wrong approach to resolving most health problems.

Think alternatives instead. Fix the problem, don't mask it with drugs that will eventually make the problem worse while inflicting other new problems.

Footnote. Be aware that pharmaceuticals become increasingly less effective over time as the body adjusts to the intrusion of the synthetic chemicals, requiring higher strength and more frequent dosages. We are not yet aware if this yet-another "effect" of pharmaceuticals has a name, but we think that it could easily be termed "higher profits for drug companies effect".

Bottom line. Pharmaceuticals are not a solution to any health problem, they merely deflect symptoms of the real problem, temporarily, while inducing worse problems while throwing in debilitating "side effects" as an aside.

Cumulative Effect of Phthalates in Pharmaceutical Drugs and OTC Meds

Researchers from Harvard and Boston Universities have published a report of their study that found high levels of phthalate metabolites in people taking pharmaceutical drugs. No surprise to us, but many people are unaware of this -- prescription drugs and over the counter "medications" contain phthalates -- if you do not know about the dangers of phthalates, they are bad for the human body, particularly children and especially unborn babies.

This study identified almost fifty different pharmaceutical drugs that contain phthalates. Note that the phthalates are simply used to make "coatings" for the drugs, an application for which much safer substances could be substituted, if their is any actual need for a coating at all to be colorful and "tasty" going down...

Part of their study utilized testing thousands of people for metabolites of various phthalates, some of which have been banned in Europe and a few even in the United States. This analysis revealed that the metabolite levels were significantly higher in people who reported taking at least one phthalate containing pharmaceutical. Additionally, the high levels of phthalates detected in the tests indicated that some people in the study exceeded safety limits that the EPA established for phthalate compounds.

Note that phthalates are used in a wide range of consumer products as well as in pharmaceutical drugs. Research reports by safety organizations reveal that the health risks from over-exposure to phthalates are seriously under estimated due to the combined cumulative exposure from all sources not being taken into adequate consideration, as it is currently viewed from individual phthalates exposure.

Not only are phthalates closely associated with adversely affecting hormone and testosterone levels, causing abnormal gender disruptions (particularly in males, e.g. "feminization"), but phthalates have also been linked to liver cancer. Be aware, tell everyone, particularly women of child bearing age.

Cumulative Effect of Pharmaceuticals

The "cumulative effect" of pharmaceutical drugs is the intense adverse reaction of a drug after it has been administered either for a prolonged period of time or ingested beyond the tolerance level of a given individual. This cumulative effect would not normally be associated with the published "side effects" of any given drug.

First, ingesting a prescription drug too frequently, aka overdosing, particularly those drugs which are excreted slowly, will result in accumulation of residual "sediments" within the organs, muscle, tissue, and even the bones of the body. At some point this produces debilitating effects, and will eventually result in a poisonous effect that may lead to diseases and cancer. Simple avoidance of exceeding the "recommended dosage" is not necessarily a means of avoiding the cumulative effect of a drug, for a number of varying reasons, but largely due to loose and even inaccurate guidelines (speculatively?) established by the drug companies, particularly in relation to tolerance levels varying widely between individuals. We logically deduce that this guideline is set minimally at the average tolerance level and does not allow for those that may be intolerant to any given drug. Note that this also applies to OTC "medications", such as Tylenol, which is also "hidden" in many other OTC products, as well as also being laced into prescription drugs, and is even found in drinking water, consequently one can overload on Tylenol without even being aware of the overdosing, hence Tylenol is the number one leading cause of liver damage even over alcohol. Be wary...

Secondly, the cumulative effect may be inflicted by ingestion of prescription drugs for a prolonged period of time. We personally know many people that have been taking the same prescription drug for decades, such as diuretics, and the prescribing doctors stated at the outset that they would have to continue to take the drug for the rest of their lives, with of course increases in strength and dosages as the (supposedly beneficial) action of the drug continually fades over time. This deleterious tactic of the profiteering western orthodox mainstream sick care medical community is referred to as "treat the symptom and not the cause" of an ailment, which of course is due to the cumulative effect of drugs and leads to more ailments which leads to the need for more medical treatment and more pharmaceutical drugs. In the example of prescribing diuretics, whereas it might be beneficial and even deemed necessary on a temporary basis, there are many alternatives to treating the conditions that lead to retention of fluids that are never addressed by doctors, only the need to use a life long drug to only counteract the symptom of a larger problem.

A third means of inducing the cumulative effect is by ingesting multiple prescription drugs, more than one of which contains the same synthetic substances and/or exhibits the same chemical properties, even redundantly inducing the same side effects. Note that many people are known to take a dozen or more prescription drugs. Do you think that these overlapping dangers have all been discovered, and if so have they have all been documented, and if so is there a thorough overlap analysis performed by doctors that prescribe drugs or by the pharmacies that dispense them?

In an attempt at being impartial and fair to the drug company community, we also succinctly note that some natural vitamins and supplements also have a tolerance level, and that the "RDA", aka "Recommended Daily" or "Dietary Amount" or "Allowance", defined loosely as the amount of an essential nutrient, such as a vitamin or mineral, established as "adequate to meet the average daily nutritional needs of most healthy persons according to age group and sex". This definition results in a rather arbitrary and very controversial measurement, and of course the actual required "average" varies by person in accordance with any debilitating conditions that they may be inflicted with, such as cumulative side effects from consuming too many prescription drugs for too long, and consequently is often well under what might be "essential" for any given person, in some cases exponentially -- that is why there are known wide spread deficiencies of vitamin D, zinc, iodine, selenium, and omega-3s, any and all of which lead to compromised immune systems. While on the combined subjects, note that pharmaceuticals and OTC "meds" are known to deplete vital nutrients. Be very wary.

Note that the "Thanksgiving Day killer" that murdered his family was on anti-psychotic and anti-depressant pharmaceutical drugs Ativan, Chronumet, Seroquel, and Atenolol. Also, realize that this drug-induced massacre was NOT an isolated incident, that this has happened before, and that it is more like a pattern than an incident... The government bureaucracy, the FDA, will never do anything about this -- the only way to combat the problem is to make everyone aware.

Novel Humor

We find it curious that the medical/pharmaceutical industrial media complex often uses the term "novel" regarding their methods and procedures and drugs and diseases, such as "the novel H1N1 virus...", "a novel detection method...", "the novel drug combo..."

It is of further interest to note that definitions of the word "novel" are "pleasantly new or different" and "an extended fictional work".

Since the plethora of fabrications defecated by the medical/pharmaceutical industrial media complex are of a highly deceptive intent, we feel that their use of the word "novel" is well applied using a word that means "fictional".

OK, so it wasn't that funny, if at all, but our point is that it is best that you associate their suspiciously odiferous emissions as "extended" fiction unless proven otherwise, however unlikely that they might actually happen to be stating the truth. Adjust your mindset, be wary, be safe...