Beware of New "Flying" Hospital Bug

This not about the egregious number of tragic deaths that occur in hospitals. We have already covered that, long ago.

But, after hearing about a new threat in hospitals and upon researching it, we find that a more serious problem than the drug resistant MRSA infections (which is contracted largely in hospitals, and usually kills it's victims), but more importantly that very few of us seem to be aware of it, and of course the media and hospitals make no effort to warn anyone (they simply do not want you to know about the danger...). So, we hereby make some waves about it.

The new danger is from bacteria know as "clostridium difficile", aka "c-diff", which causes infections, not as deadly as MRSA immediately, but long term it can result in some rather "adverse conditions", such as colitis.

The three important issues to note regarding this emerging danger is that typical sanitation habits that might fend of MRSA do not work with C-diff, that (because of this) the number of c-diff infections have surpassed MRSA and continue to increase at an alarming rate, that more virulent forms of the C-diff bacteria are expected to emerge, and that like MRSA there does not seem to be any effective means to prevent or treat the c-diff infection.

Footnote. As with any bacteria or virus contracted in a hospital, these same infectious, contagious agents also tend to migrate to nursing homes and other types of "health care facilities". Keep this in mind, minimize exposure, keep your immune system strong (avoid vaccines which cause degradation and disorders of the immune system), and do what you can to practice good sanitation in a sick care environment.

Lastly on this, realize that this bacteria is classified as "contagious", just like a virus, in that this type of bacteria is said to develop "spores" which it can release that float around in the air -- so, infection is not just from direct contact, you can pick up the spores just by breathing.

The drug companies must be out partying, spending all their money they made from the H1N1 vaccine, as they should have already produced a c-diff vaxine -- heck, just relabel the tons of unused H1N1 vaccine and use that, as a vaccine doesn't need to be "effective"...

Warn others about this, because the media and the sick care community sure as hell are not going to warn anyone...

UPDATE! Note the following blurb from the Mayo Clinic on c-diff. "Some people who have C. difficile never become sick, though they can still spread the infection. C. difficile illness usually develops during or shortly after a course of antibiotics. But signs and symptoms may not appear for weeks or even months afterward". Now, isn't that interesting...

Todays Updates

On the FluBits blog: Mosquitoes Spreading Vaccines. Yes, scientists have managed to screw up mosquitoes such that you don't have to have a needle stuck in your arm for a vaccination, just go stand out in the swamp every once in a while. This may sound humorous, but unfortunately we did not make this up, it is depressingly real. So sell your stock in that mosquito fogging business and insect repellents, as they will soon ban the practice of spraying insecticide in the air so that everyone can get properly mosquitinated, and they admit in some cases over vaccinated or vaccinated for entirely the wrong things -- but hey, that happens anyway already...

On the FluBits blog: Vaccine Didn't Slow Down H1N1. Another "no joke", experts slipped up and admitted that the H1N1 vaccine was NOT effective against -- guess what -- the H1N1 virus... So, all of you that were injected with the toxic sludge, well, now you got some extra toxic sludge in your body. Maybe we should sell t-shirts that say something like "I survived the H1N1 vaccine -- well, so far anyway".

On the FluBits blog: Aluminated, a.k.a. Toxiticized or Poisonuted. This is a "must read" for a rainy day. Absolute proof that they are out to get you, and me, and everybody else, except them of course -- they wouldn't be stupid enough to be injected with a toxic death-inducing sludge. Seriously folks, this is not a rant, it is proof that we all need to become activists to have the toxins removed from vaccines -- "just the antigen please"...


Footnote. When using any of the above blog link(s), only that one post will appear, and if you would care to peruse any other recent postings on that particular blog while there, just click on either 'HOME' or 'OLDER POSTS' underneath the presented post, or click on an item under 'LABELS' or an item under 'BLOG ARCHIVE' in the side-bar on the right side of the page to see more postings, or click on your browser's "back" button to return here. If doing so, there is a link back to this blog from all other blogs.

Silent Genocide of the Elderly

It is not well known, but nursing home residents that have absolutely no psychotic disorders are given anti-psychotic drugs. The use of such powerful drugs is problematic for the nursing home residents that have absolutely no condition calling for the administration of the drugs because most of the residents already have a form of dementia, a condition that puts them at an increased risk of death when given these powerful drugs. These psychotropic drugs are designed, questionably, to treat people with severe mental illnesses such as schizophrenia, not dementia, and certainly not those that have absolutely no neurological problems.

Most nursing home residents are treated with these anti-psychotic drugs simply to "sedate" them (aka, to "drug" them), but especially to control and suppress behaviors of any residents that are "difficult" for the (under-staffed) nursing home staff.

It is said that victims that have been subjected to this mistreatment, that were subsequently relieved of forced feeding of these "medications", expressed that being drugged in this manner may outwardly seem like the victim is calm and complacent, but inwardly they feel alone and trapped, like being locked up in solitary confinement, a horrifically unpleasant existence for those that already have mental difficulties, or don't.

Millions of baby boomers are expected to develop dementia, many of which will end up in nursing homes. If you are a boomer or know someone that is, take note, warn others, prepare...

Footnote. Consider that rather than sedating elders with debilitating drugs, why not give them medical marijuana instead, which has been proven to be beneficial for many conditions of the elderly. Let them "grow their own" in their rooms, in the hallways, in their sun-rooms, give them something interesting to cultivate. Maybe grow some herbs and spices too... Seriously.

Note that, "it is said", that this intentional drugging of the elderly is performed primarily to reduce costs. Consider that the anti-psychotics may have a price, but the fact that they make the nursing home residents "controllable", drugged up, sitting around gazing out the window or mindlessly shoved in front of a TV all day, allows the nursing homes to "manage" the residents with considerably less staff, which saves considerably more money than the drugs cost. Our point is that this travesty is inflicted on the elderly out of greed, and everyone should raise some hell about this damnable scenario. Further consider, that could be you someday -- wouldn't you rather catch a natural buzz, get the munchees, eat some pizza, feel horny again, rather than be doped up such that you sit in a corner and slobber all over yourself, and do other things that we won't mention...?

Salmonella Alert: Hydrolized Vegetable Protein, aka HVP, MSG, Monosodium Glutamate, Neurotoxin, or Poison

First, note that hydrolized vegetable protein (aka, "HVP") is simply a new name for the new form of the infamous monosodium glutamate, (aka, MSG). Note that the reason that MSG was removed from foods is that it was finally admitted to be a neurotoxic, endocrine disrupting, excitotoxin, which is a nice obfuscating way of saying "poison", albeit a slow poison, which is responsible for a number of maladies that conveniently require "sick care" treatment. HVP, like MSG, is concocted by "boiling down" soy, corn, or wheat (which already are contaminated with plenty of of their own impurities such as herbicides and insecticides) using of all things hydrochloric acid, and then "neutralizing" the resulting chemical effluvient, which of course then also contains "trace amounts" of good ole hydrochloric acid, with good ole sodium hydroxide. This "breaks down" the resultilng so-called protein crud into a dark colored liquid, now also containing trace amounts of the sodium hydroxide of course, that is in reality is just a mutation of the toxic "sodium salt" known originally as monosodium glutamate, MSG. Don't you just love the way that our good ole bribed FDA is duplicitous in allowing this kind of known hidden switch of toxic food ingredients to a different name...

Anyway, we digress, as it is hard not to do on this topic. The original point is that we have some much too busy friends that were unaware of the HVP "product" recall whom are known to ingest some "convenient" snack foods (along with a little beer and wine...) in their busy hurry to get through life as fast as they possibly can. Considering that, since the evil "powers that be" do everything that they can to keep everyone much too busy, we thought that we would note the recall here in the hope that someone might notice this and pass the word along to their busy friends.

This HVP swill is disguised as a hidden "flavor enhancer" that is clandestinely dumped into many processed foods such as soups, dips, and hot dogs. To this we say, those kinds of "snack" foods are filled with many processed poisonous carcinogenic substances, such as HVP, all of which will solve the problem of life being to busy, decades before you get a chance to slow down and enjoy life in later years, unless the satanic "powers that be" someday manage to do away with "retirement" and keep us all busy throughout our entire lives.

Here is a link to a searchable database of products that are on the HVP recall list, although we simply suggest strict avoidance of "snack products"; think of them as "snatch products", things that will "snatch" your life away much too soon. And for those youngsters out there that have been conditioned to think that getting old and taking life easy is not something high on your list of desirable things to do, take it from someone that participated heavily in the era of "free love" which provided the benefits of "sex, drugs, and rock and roll": it only gets better with age, and better and better, without all of those hangovers and drug withdrawals and VD clinic visits that were a "side effect" of being younger. A side note on that last suggestion: avoid pharmaceuticals, because they are just drugs that mask, screen, and hide the real joys of life, while turning people into slobbering, joyless, muddle-headed, grouchy, mean, immoral, hypocritical, demented, lifeless, soul-less, devil-worshiping, lying, unconscionable "I got mine" assholes (a.k.a. politicians), which is precisely what the drugs were designed and intended to do in order to benefit the drug manufacturers...

Opinion. If the world was right, if our government did the right thing, their should be a recall on snack products just because they are poisonous "as is", not because they might happen to be contaminated with salmonella. Isn't contamination with an endocrine disrupting neurotoxin reason enough to keep it out of the reach of the mindless brainwashed masses. Well, yes it is, but this little planet is overpopulated anyway, intentionally, and we have to drive the lemmings over the cliff into the sick care abyss to stimulate the economy for the rich...

Footnote. For food additives, a mountain of obfuscating disinformation exists pro and con, true and false. No exception with MSG/HVP, which is also associated with the amino acid glutamate in various forms in various foods and supplements. of course the FDA not only does nothing to regulate the product, but it actually confuses the issue and looks the other way, looking right toward those that bribe them with their hand out. Anyway, there are many variables and exceptions surrounding all of these substances, but the one constant we stress is that if it is a "food additive" that it is not good for you and yours. Bottom line, be wary, there is an abundance of highly confusing and even erroneous information out there on these topics.

Asthma and Allergies: Another Part of The Big Lie

We observed with interest the announcement of the new bronchial thermoplasty "treatment" performed in a hospital as an outpatient three times over three days. Note number one was that it was stated that this treatment is not always effective (surprise, surprise) and at the end of the bobble-fest there was a much too short whisperation that "the procedure does not come without some risk", of course. Hells bells, just simply visiting a hospital invokes a risk of catching a bacterial infection that can result in permanent afflictions and even death. Then they want to stick hot pipes (which may well be contaminated with bacteria, viruses, and who knows what) down into our bronchial passageways as a form of "treatment"? Geez Loueez... Note number two was that as the medical "ex-spurt" wrapped up his spiel, the news commentator, aka bobble head, astutely (surprisingly) asked the logical obvious question as to what else could be done to alleviate the consequences of asthma, to which the "spurt" did (surprisingly) respond that the underlying problem of asthma was inflammation and that if you should "fix the inflammation and that might fix the asthma" (must have caught him off guard, he told the truth rather than say take drugs for it...).

Before we address the recommended solutions for asthma and allergies, we must back up all the way to conception; yeh, pregnancy, prenatally, before birth, to point out the number one cause of asthma and allergies. Pregnant women should NOT NOT NOT be injected with any kind of vaccine (and any female that might ever become pregnant should minimize innocuous inoculations throughout life, starting at birth).

First, aside from causing astma and allergies, vaccines are associated with miscarriages and stillbirths (just check the VAERS database for all of the miscarriages that occurred right after injections of the H1N1 vaccine, which just happened to be strongly recommended by the scurrilous health agencies), as well as deformities and numerous diseases, so aside from asthma and allergies, right there is a good reason to avoid vaccines during (and before) pregnancy. Here is a direct link to our post on the subject, which also has a link to the VAERS database information -- tell everyone, pass it on...


Secondly, vaccines are admitted and documented to at least wreck, but also to even completely destroy, the immune system of the human body. The adjuvants and numerous toxins in vaccines clandestinely (you don't KNOW it, you can't FEEL it) over-stimulate the immune system as much as tenfold, by a factor of ten. For a clear analogy to remember and pass along to everyone you know, consider that instead of having a couple of cups of coffee in the morning, try having TWENTY cups of coffee after you get up, and be sure to load all that coffee up with sugar, cream, and how about some artificial sweetener that just happens to be a poison (kind of like the sugar and food additives they dump into vaccines). Does that make ANY sense? Would you do that willingly, knowingly? Again, remember this analogy and tell everyone... After the repeated over-revving of the immune system through the barrage of vaccinations that a child is subjected to, the immune system eventually begins to wear out and all types of immune disorders begin to surface; the list of immune disorders is much too long to insert here, but realize that just about any sickness, malady, chronic condition, or disease that you can think of is the result of a weakened immune system, at least in part if not wholely. The major point of this one point about asthma is to realize and remember that inflammation (which the aforementioned medical "ex-spurt" inadvertently admitted caused asthma) is a known, proven, documented immune disorder, which is the result of a weakened immune system, which is the result of a barrage of vacuous vaccinations, innocuous inoculations, shoddy shots, bad jabs, needlessly needling...

Thirdly, asthma and allergies are the result of both overactive immune systems and also weakened immune systems. Therefore, the simple correlation is that since vaccines radically over-rev the immune system and eventually weaken and destroy it, vaccines therefore induce asthma and allergies. A simple logical fact, but do "they" point that out? No, and they would somehow deny this plain simple hidden truth if asked. That is called hypocrisy, and remember the "Hypocritical Oath".

We are realizing that the topic of asthma and allergies is much too extensive to address here in a blog post, and have decided that this must instead be the subject of a webpage on our main WisBits website. We will finish compiling pertinent information and will then establish this under the "Illness and Disease" category. In the interim, we have started to address the subject of building immunity on our main WisBits website, just click on this link to go there if interested. Check back from time to time, we will advise here on our blog when we have implemented the asthma and allergies webpages on our main site.

We must close at this point by warning that "procedures" and drugs are not the answer to fixing the problems of allergies and asthma, as those efforts only temporarily treat the symptoms of the condition and do not in any way attempt to actually fix the root of the problem. Avoidance of further wrecking the immune system is a good start, then building back up the immune system is the right direction to head, noting that drugs for allergies further wreck your immune system, all a part of the intentionally built-in "rebound effect" of all pharmaceutical drugs, great for profits of the sick care industry, but not so good for the resultant weakened, sickened, and diseased populace. Be wary, beware, inform everyone...

The Mainstream Propaganda Machine

We recently observed several articles scattered here and there, all of them regurgitating the same "news" in a similar but slightly different fashion. This supposed "news" regarded what was being referred to as a "dietary supplement" that was found to be responsible for some adverse "side effects", similar to those that are consistently warned of with pharmaceuticals (of course).

Out of concern and in the interest of fairness, we looked into the matter with the intent of issuing an alert here regarding what seemed on the surface to be a new issue that deserved a warning.

It took a great deal of effort on our part to get to the bottom of the "story", as there was very little actual information on exactly what the "supplement" was nor what was at the root of the problem. We did finally uncover the fact that this "supplement" was traced to a chiropractor in the state of Florida, and that three of the flavors (of how many flavors we were unable to determine) of this supplement (a liquid apparently) were found to contain excessive amounts of chromium and selenium, 17 times the amount regarded as safe. The FDA "was" [sic] investigating how the excess amounts got into the product, but there was no conclusion on that either, and the inference seemed to be that it was an accidental mistake in the manufacturing process.

So, we hereby make a very long story short with the following simplistic bullet points that we finally managed to mine out of the itty bitty ant hill of extremely ambiguous (dis)information.

This "news" story was actually TWO years old and was not even very significant when it actually broke back then.

This current versions of the two year old "news" story was highly obfuscated with very little specific information relating to the original "story".

This "news" story was nothing more than absolute ghostwritten ambiguous obfuscations, picked up by the maelstrom of mainstream medical/pharmaceutical shills, in an attempt to discredit "dietary supplements", but was more pointedly implicating vitamin and mineral supplements by inference, with a slam also leveled at the chiropractic "witchcraft" profession in the process for "peddling" the "snake oil", which was likely manufactured by a paid shill of Big Pharma and the excessive levels of chromium and selenium were likely intentional to produce the exact effect that they did produce so that the propaganda machine could discredit anything and everything non-mainstream...

Note that the tainted product was recalled, with no actual mention of if it is still around (but does not appear to be), nor was there any mention of the manufacturer anywhere. Likely this is all classified and buried in the basement case files of the FDA no doubt, and just pops up now and then as if it was a current news story, a periodic repeat attack on "supplements" by the machine.

The propaganda machine has discovered a new tactic; if it's a slow news week, or if any of the hired shills can't think up any new lies, just go back to the archives, dig up an old story, and "doctor" it up to obfuscate the hell out of it, making it look like it is current breaking "news"...

Be wary, most of what you are told, hear, and read about anything from a governmental, medical, or big media source, is intended to mislead and deceive you, to their profit and to the detriment of the herd of lemmings going over the cliff into the mainstream medical/pharmaceutical abyss (that would be you and yours).

More Proof Vaccines are NOT Effective and the CDC Lies about the fact...

Note that altho this topic mainly targets vaccines and has been posted on the FluBits blog, we are also posting it here since it points out the incredibly unethical audacity of the CDC to tell bald-faced lies to us.

In a recent outbreak of mumps in the northeastern U.S., it was discovered that 77 percent of the victims had been fully vaccinated against the mumps virus.

This "one out of four" factor just happens to conform with the admitted ineffectiveness of the inserts provided with the H1N1 flu vaccine, working "less than 30% of the time" (how MUCH "less than 30%"...).

Now for a dose of reality. The CDC, aka the Corruptors of Disease Confuscation, has the unethical audacity to publish the lie on their website that in their biased, prejudiced, paid-off, blatantly deceptive opinion, the mumps vaccine is "76 to 95 percent effective" [sic], the exact opposite of the truth. What a bunch of low-life sinister charlatans.

Remember this, apply it to all vaccines, to all health agencies, and to the mainstream medical/pharmaceutical industrial complex. Their toxic, poisonous vaccines are NOT effective, certainly NOT safe, and they ALL lie about it...

Cola Kills

A study that encompassed 60,000 people, conducted over a period of fourteen years concluded that those who drank two or more sodas per week were 87 percent more likely (than those individuals who didn't consume any soda) to develop deadly pancreatic cancer.

No association was made with which of the numerous toxic ingredients in cola was the culprit in this one "side effect", but we would wager that HFCS had something to do with it.

The Soda/Cola industrial complex has pretty much managed to suppress this crucial information, and of course big media is avoiding revealing this danger about one of their nefarious "sponsors". If the world was right, instead of those cola commercials aired during the super bowl last night, this should have been presented, but big money always wins out. Tell everyone, especially anyone you observe dumping a cola down into their life support system...

Link to article on killer cola

Diagnose Normal Condition as Disease, Treat it with Drug that Causes Disease

If physicians talked into a device that converted their lies to the truth, about "diagnosing" a newly classified normal natural condition of the human body as a supposed disease, here is how it would go: "Hey, you got what we have started calling "ostopenia", and it's a normal part of aging, and it's not a disease, nor is it in any way actually debilitating, and we just dreamed up the word to categorize women that are on the safe side of NOT having osteoporosis, and since we went to all the trouble of inventing a name for a natural condition that's unproblematic, hey, we concocted a deleterious drug that won't be at all beneficial in any way because there is no real problem that you should take this drug for, especially because you are in such excellent health, and even though this unneeded drug will induce other illnesses and diseases through the intentionally built-in side effects, we got medications for those problems too, so pretty soon you won't be so damned healthy any more, just dependent on our "sick care" drugs until you die an early unnatural death because of all them drugs..."

We hope that our rendition of what really happened is amusing, because the truth is, it is not at all funny. The situation that the aforementioned describes is reality. Drug companies and doctors delineated the difference between normal bone thinning and abnormal bone thinning, aka osteoporisis, and for some reason decided to give this non-condition the name of ostopenia -- wallah, that allows them to classify it as a "condition". A condition for which they now convince completely normal healthy women to take a drug for this non-existent condition. A drug which has no benefit (because there is no actual problem), but of course the drug is admitted to inflict a side effect disorder (entirely contradictory to it's supposed benefit) known such as osteonecrosis of the jaw, also know as "death of bone" or "jawbone death". Other side effects associated with the useless, un-needed drug just happen to be esophageal cancer, atrial fibrillation, hypocalcemia (a blood calcium deficiency), eye inflammation leading to blindness, and of course all of the typical standard so-what silly little ole inconsequential things like ulcers, adverse skin reactions, renal failure, and default run of the mill liver damage.

You don't believe this do you? You think this is an April Fool's joke? Well, it ain't April and we ain't in Kansas anymore. So, here is a link to an NPR article that confirms that we are not making this up, as certifiably insane as it all sounds. A Mayo Clinic article provided confirmation of the admission of the aforementioned osteonecrosis "side effect".

Next time you dare to wander into the lion's den and are told you have a "condition" that you have never heard of which doesn't make any sense, be very skeptical.

In the interim, will someone out there please get infuriated about this, pass it along -- they could be doing this to your Mother, your Sister, your Wife, your Daughter, your lover, your friend...

Footnote: as opposed to our "if they told the truth, this is how it would sound" rendition above, we wonder just what in the heck they actually say to dance around the truth and convince a healthy person to take a drug that they don't need for a non-existent condition they don't even have which will induce the actual disease that they don't have. Sounds like a situation for an "expose" where a female reporter with a hidden camera visits a doc that is known to pull this trick on women, just to see how they manage to word the deception. Where is "60 Minutes" on this???

HFCS: the Road to Death Junction thru Disease City via Fatsville

HFCS, also known as High Fructose Corn syrup or just fructose, is a "sweetener" produced from corn which is produced by the American agricultural industry, also know as "Big Ag".

HFCS is referred to as "sweet poison" and a "slow poison". A book about HFCS is in fact entitled "Sweet Poison".

HFCS is now present in every type of processed packaged food in America.

More than ninety percent of the money Americans spend on their meals is made up of the HFCS containing processed packaged foods.

HFCS is now found in all sodas, of which the average American consumes sixty gallons per year.

HFCS is also found in all American (bottled/packaged) sweetened fruit juices.

HFCS is even used in baby formulas and baby foods in America.

The current average per capita consumption of HFCS by Americans is 63 pounds per year.

HFCS significantly diminishes the normal body signals to the brain of being satiated (unlike glucose), directly and indirectly increasing caloric consumption, promotes cravings and overeating, eventually to the point of gluttony.

Our point: numerous studies verify the above contentions and document the fact that HFCS is responsible for the increase in obesity and disease in Americans. Do you see the comparison of the traits of HFCS to that with addictive drugs?

Further, consider the following three points regarding bodily assimilation of glucose, alcohol, and HFCS.

One. The basic energy source for the human body is glucose derived from ingesting food. Stated simply, eighty percent of the glucose from a meal is distributed throughout the entire body, with the remaining twenty percent delivered to and metabolized by the liver where it is stored as glycogen until needed. Natural, no problems.

Two. By contrast, alcoholic beverages result in eighty percent of the ethyl alcohol being directed to the liver to be metabolized. Long story short, all kinds of bad things transpire within the liver and the pancreas, resulting in thirty times the load of glucose from food and leads to several diseases including obesity, cirrhosis, and diabetes. As bad as this may sound HFCS actually produces a much worse effect than alcohol.

Three. HFCS is metabolized in the same way as alcohol with the same adverse effects and more, but ONE HUNDRED PERCENT of fructose bombards the liver -- ALL of it. Another non-technical, long story short, fructose creates uric acid (causes inflammation and gout), blocks the nitric oxide enzyme (results in high blood pressure), hyperlipidemia is induced (leads to pancreatitis, bad cholesterol, cardiovascular disease), and insulin resistance is increased (leads to onset of syndrome X and diabetes). As with alcohol resulting in thirty times the load to the liver, HFCS results in forty times the load of glucose, along with causing the aforementioned adverse abnormalities and diseases.

Add to all of the above negative aspects of HFCS, researchers have recently revealed in two studies, one of which is published in the journal Environmental Health and the other by the Institute for Agriculture and Trade Policy, that HFCS is contaminated with mercury, a heavy metal that is toxic to humans and especially to the neurological function of fetuses and children. Realize that children have insatiable "sweet tooths" and ingest processed foods, candies, colas, and juices that are heavily laden with HFCS and therefore contaminated with mercury.

Further, given all the above, realize that HFCS is a known, scientifically documented slow poison that weakens, sickens, and eventually leads to debilitating and fatal diseases in increasingly innumerable Americans, about which the the supposed so-called federal "health" agencies do absolutely nothing, except look the other way, looking to their big daddies, Big Ag, Big Biz, Big Med, Big Pharma, Big Gov, Big Politics, and Big Media to all fund them and brainwash the populace into going over the cliff into the mainstream sick care system like the proverbial herd of lemmings, all for the prosperity of the profiteering aforementioned group of Big Sleazeball Hoodlums.

Now that you know some of the details of this nefarious scenario, do something about it. First learn to avoid HFCS, inform everyone you know, and then together, raise some considerable hell.

Footnote. Big Ag, et al, are running a campaign of conflicting, highly misleading, and intentionally deceptive disinformation about the "safety" [sic] of HFCS. Do not be fooled by their nefariously sinister propaganda -- the above information that we provided is scientifically accurate and well documented; the lies of the Big Sleazeballs look innocent enough, but they are just ghostwritten cleverly deceptive diversionary lies by shills using supposedly scientific sham studies paid for by the group of Big Hoodlums.

Thousands of Radiation "Injuries" Yearly

Last year over three thousand patients were "injured" by radiation overdoses with most of them being serious enough to necessitate treatment in hyperbaric oxygen chambers, which use pure pressurized oxygen in an attempt to promote healing. The outcome of the treatment for these "injuries" was not stated and does not seem to be available -- surprise, surprise...

We emphasize that these injuries were known injuries, as in producing immediate and obviously detrimental effects -- some lesser "injuries" that may not be immediately obvious no doubt occur. Note that any unnecessary radiation exposure should be avoided, that the adverse effects of radiation exposure are cumulative, and that radiation from xrays will eventually CAUSE cancer.

Be wary, avoid radiation, tell everyone.

Footnote. CT scans, aka "cat scans" bombard the body with hundreds more times the dose of radiation than basic xray devices. MRI's are not nearly as bad as CT scans but are much worse than basic xray devices. However, as in the warning of this post, always consider that mis-calibrated radiation machines of even the less dangerous type can result in more danger than the most dangerous type.

Click on this link to an article about the radiation injuries if interested in more details.

Prostate Cancer Radiation Mistakes

The next post below this one addressed a report by the mainstream medical community admitting that their treatments for prostate cancer do more harm than good and that it was better for them to do nothing at all medically.

Here, we follow up on the prior post in noting that the New York Times recently published a warning that a commonly used prostate cancer treatment called brachytherapy was, you guessed it, doing more harm than good, only in this case the "harm" was deadly dangerous.

The treatment uses small radioactive "seeds" that are "implanted" in the prostate gland (ouch!) to hopefully dull the cancer. However, the investigation revealed that "mistakes" during the implant process mean the seeds may "miss the diseased prostate" and instead cause radiation overdoses to the bladder or other healthy body parts, which are then not so healthy, as in "fried" with radiation...

Click on this link if you would care to peruse the article.

Or just see the next post below if you would like some real world safe and effective advice on how to avoid prostate problems.

Prostate Health/Cancer Truths/Advice

In the year 2009, a count of more than 218,000 American men were diagnosed with some form of prostate problem, from BPH to cancer.

A report by the mainstream medical community on clinical studies regarding this topic, indicated that of seven prostate cancer treatments offered by mainstream medicine, ranging from prostate removal to radioactive implants, not only did none of these mainstream recommendations have any redeemable merit, but they also were indicated as causing "harm", with the most superior treatment being to do nothing at all medically. Studies have also indicated that the PSA test for prostate cancer saves few lives and generally leads to the introduction of the aforementioned "harm", doing more harm than good. We did NOT make this up -- there are links at the bottom of this post to the report and an article from the New York Times about the report.

But first, we have to relate that we have personally experienced relatives being inflicted with this cancer and had already come to this same conclusion long ago because of that experience. The point which we came away with is that while mainstream medicine admits that their treatments are not only not effective in this scenario and conversely "does harm", that there are alternative treatments that are effective not only in treatment of the cancer, but most importantly in preventative measures to avoid every contracting the cancer in the first place.

We list some advice based on our acquired knowledge from our personal experiences below. Note that this is still in a draft stage and that we are posting it with what information we have managed to document at this point, but that we intend to get back to this and add to the list...

Considerations for Prostate Health

The mineral zinc is hailed as the most effective measure in avoidance of prostate disorders -- note that men deplete zinc when they ejaculate.

A daily supplement of 50 to 100 milligrams of zinc for men is the general recommendation, depending on the degree of zinc depletion and also ingestion of foods rich in zinc. Be careful to avoid consistently consuming the equivalent of more than 100 milligrams of zinc for prolonged periods of time.

Although animal based foods such as meat and dairy products are rich sources of zinc, they should generally be avoided as the modern day products are heavily tainted with contaminants that can lead to prostate cancer...

Lycopene is an antioxidant agent that is said to be beneficial for prostate health.

Saw palmetto extract and nettle leaf are highly recommended supplements for the prostate.

Fermented soy products such as tofu, tempeh, and miso are said to be beneficial for prostate health -- non-fermented soy is not recommended.

Genistein and isoflavinoids, which are found in soy, have been found to be particularly effective against hormone dependent cancers such as prostate cancer.

Beta-bitosterol, one of many beneficial plant sterols, is said to be very important in many health conditions including prostate health -- good sources are pecans, cashews, saw palmetto, avocados, pumpkin seeds, black cumin seed, pygeum africanum, rice bran, wheat germ, sea buckthorn, and wolfberry (also referred to commercially as goji berry).

The spices circumen and cayenne pepper contribute to prostate (and overall) health.

We should note that some studies have indicated that increased sexual activity in men under forty tends to increase the incidence of prostate cancer but the opposite is true of men over forty. What the studies failed to address and clarify on the former point, was that the high level of ejaculations led to zinc deficiencies which cause prostate problems. And, to emphasize the latter point, older men that remain sexually active have a lower incidence of prostate cancer. The bottom line is to clean out that prostate gland, but don't overwork it unless you supplement with zinc to compensate...


Link to NYT article on the report.

Link to Annals of Medicine report.

Tech Advice: Ditch the Internet Explorer browser

There is a quote below from a recent article regarding several countries advising to "ditch IE". There is a link to the article below the quote.

We personally advise doing same, as good ole IE not only tends to be terribly insecure but is horrendously slow compared to other browsers in many respects. We personally recommend using the Firefox and Chrome browsers. If you are not aware, Chrome has a new beta version which now has hundreds of extensions like Firefox, some of which are better, but still does not have the entire overall functionality of Firefox. We include at the bottom of this post a link to a prior post that we did on the new Chrome functionality...

"In light of the recent attacks on Google China and Microsoft's revelation that an Internet Explorer security flaw served as an impetus in the assault, Germany's Federal Office for Information Security has released a warning to its population: avoid IE."

Link to the article.

Link to prior post regarding new Google Chrome beta and extensions.

MRSA "Superbug" is now in Beach Sand, and Kills More People than AIDS

Subtitle: methicillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus and methicillin resistant coagulase-negative Staphylococcus "superbugs" now found on public beaches

Methicillin Resistant Staphylococcus Aureus, aka MRSA, is a "superbug" deviation of the common staph infection. Note that MRSA has evolved to be resistant to the antibiotic methicillin, hence "resistant", and is generally said to be untreatable.

MRSA arose from the germ, bacteria, and viral incubators of hospitals, where antibiotics were overused to prevent and treat it. But in recent years it has escaped health care facilities and has evolved to the point that it now has the ability to infect even healthy people and is very lethal. It is important to note that MRSA now kills more people in the United States than AIDS.

Researchers in Washington state recently tested ten nearby public beaches in the Puget Sound area and found thirteen different varieties of staph bacteria at nine of the beaches, seven of which were resistant to treatment. Five of these MRSA samples were "highly similar" to those found in hospitals.

The inference was made, albeit very lightly, that "Some form of contamination was responsible for the presence of the bacteria. Where all of these organisms are coming from and how they're getting seeded on the beaches is not clear." The word "seeded" in the prior sentence gives rise to speculation - did they mean to imply like "Johnny Appleseed" where someone is going around and tossing the bacteria to and fro? Also, another report indicated that the MRSA contamination likely entered the beaches through "environmental contamination". We minimally interpret the underlying implication was that MRSA was "escaping" health care facilities and was being washed out to sea, although we wonder if the MRSA was being spread by some other means, since the only medically recommended treatment is a drug, altho confoundingly MRSA is said to be "drug resistant". The inference was also made that the presence of the bacteria proves to be much higher than previously suspected.

Note that a study was performed, believe it or not, on how staph bacterial infections were contracted from beaches, and that those that dug in the sand or were covered with sand had a higher incidence of infection than those that walked or lay on the beach. No information was provided on those that bathed in ocean water, although we are aware that ocean waters in highly populated areas tend to have a higher amount of bacteria and that staph thrives in salty environments. Additionally, those with cuts, abrasions, or sores were said to be the most susceptible to contracting MRSA or staph from exposure to bacteria at the beach.

It is obvious to conclude that anyone with skin breakages should avoid the beach, and everyone else should thoroughly "disinfect" afterwards. Note that altho regular testing of ocean water at the beach is (or should be) performed to determine the levels of bacterial contaminants, that the accuracy of the reported results should be highly suspect if any tourism is involved. Also note that we are unaware of similar testing of beach sand, but have noted that sand on most all beaches in populated areas is said to be tainted with bacteria.

Below are links to two sources of info on MRSA at the beach.

MRSA in layperson terms from USA Today.

MRSA in more technical terms from the American Journal of Epidemiology.

This is of the Utmost Importance to You and Yours, Especialy to Anyone with Children

This information was originally posted on our FluBits blog, as it mainly pertains to vaccines. However, it has been pointed out to us that this is a crucially important and highly controversial issue, about which there is highly misleading disinformation, that also pertains to the health of children and to the medical community, and therefore should be passed along in every way possible to everyone -- so we hereby double post...

Everyone should click on this link to peruse studies that definitively link vaccines to neurological disorders, especially autism.

As previously mentioned, this is very controversial matter, about which there is a great deal of deviously deceptive disinformation which appears credible, but is not credible, and is actually dangerously misleading.

There is a lot of info at this link, a lot of it links to technical studies for proof. What is important is that it is correct and it is viable and it is credible and it is therefore convincing. If you know anyone that has young children, you do them a dis-service if you do not bring this to their attention with emphasis.

If you need incentive, a quote from the "quick history" page of the site: "In the 1980s, most estimates of the rate of autism were that it affected 1 in 10,000 children. Today, the official estimate of the autism rate is 1 in 150, with many localities reporting rates closer to 1 in 100."

Note that the rate of autism is proportionately higher in countries that have higher vaccination rates -- the U.S. is the worst with the highest of both. This is just one obvious and alarming fact of hundreds on the website that cannot be ignored nor refuted.

Devote some time to passing this along to anyone that has young children, or you might end up feeling terribly guilty should the worst transpire.

For anyone that is new to this blog that might yet be uninformed, you are likely asking yourself why isn't this front page headline news. If that is the case, you need to be educated about paid-for paid-off "big media" (consider the proliferation of excessive drug commercials), and spend some time on this blog and our companion FluBits blog and our main WisBits website, for the benefit of you and yours.

Although this information is proof of the damage of vaccines in relation to the causation of autism, this must also be viewed as proof that the myth that vaccines are safe is "the big lie" and that this is the tip of the iceberg as to the actual, total spectrum of damage that vaccines inflict on their victims.

Pharmaceuticals can kill you even if you don't take them.

Pharmaceuticals can kill you and your family even if you or your family do not (intentionally) have anything to do with pharma drugs (but, they are in the "water supply"*).

First we should explain that we are acquiescing to a suggestion that we separately expand upon some information that originally was mostly a side example that we included in another post. The suggestion was that we isolate that singular topic by itself mostly for the sake of emphasis but also for clarification and elaboration, lest the importance of the ("too succinctly stated") matter be lost within the ("long winded, boring") post, which might well result in the point being skipped over by many (really? was the other post that bad?). Anyway, be aware that you may have seen this tidbit before, but not in this much detail.

Surely most everyone should be aware that it is admitted that pharmaceutical drugs kill well over 100,000 people every year -- that is, they kill people that ingest them via inducing adverse health/diseases. What many are unaware of, is that pharmaceutical drugs can kill you even if you do not ingest any, and never have.

One recent example. On Thanksgiving Day, a family, including the elderly, children, an unborn baby/pregnant Mother, were cruelly massacred by a family member, supposedly without reason, but clearly premeditated. The killer that murdered his family was known to use a deadly mind-numbing cocktail of the anti-psychotic and anti-depressant pharmaceutical drugs Ativan, Chronumet, Seroquel, and Atenolol.

A less recent example that everyone should still remember. A mother of five young children, while taking a psycho-pharmacological cocktail which included "super high doses" of Haldol, Effexor, and Wellbutrin, methodically drowned each of her five children in the bathtub.

An example from a decade ago and what you probably didn't know is that the "leader" of the killers in the Columbine school shooting was taking the prescription anti-depressant Luvox. Bet you didn't know that, it was kept quiet, like so many similar incidents where Big Media suppresses that information to please their advertisers, the drug companies that profit from these killer drugs.

Rather than ramble on with a gruesome long list of examples like these, we will simply note that almost all of the massacres over the past decade are said to have had one thing in common: that they were committed by people taking drugs like Prozac, Zoloft, Luvox, Paxil or similar prescription anti-depressant or anti-psychotic pharmaceutical drugs.

There is even a technical name established just for these drug-induced murders, "akathisia", defined as "mental and physical agitation that sparks self-destructive, violent behavior." Further, "they can also induce dissociative reactions, making those who take the drugs insensitive to the consequences of their behavior."

This is outrageous. Doctors prescribe these murderous drugs like candy to thousands of people that don't need them (a new study indicates the drugs are worthless for "mild" depression), endangering you and your loved ones.

The government bureaucracies, especially the corrupt puppet of the of Big Pharma, the U.S. FDA, will never do anything about this unless the populace speaks out about the needless widespread prescribing of these drugs, and likely not even then. However, the only way to hope to combat this problem is to make everyone aware of this ludicrous dilemma and then for everyone to speak out against it in every way possible.

*Footnote. Just because you and yours and most everyone else is NOT intentionally ingesting pharmaceuticals that turn depressed or even normal people into rabid mad dogs that kill anyone and everyone, that does not mean that "you all" may not unintentionally be ingesting these dangerous murder-evoking pharmaceutical drugs. A plethora of scientific research study reports all agree that the water supply, whether municipally "treated" (aka MIS-treated) water supplies, as well as aquifers and other "natural" sources of drinking water (artesian wells, springs, lakes, etc.) all are now tainted with HUNDREDS of pharmaceutical drugs. We observe that the bureaucratic hypocrites try to push this off onto drugees peeing out the drugs and that the "wastewater" gets into the the other water supplies, but we strongly suspect that there is a "Johnny Appleseed" of Big Pharma going about sprinkling drugs into any and every place possible. And, we forsee that this footnote will culminate in yet another "suggestion" that we also transform this sub-topic into it's own separate expanded topic. Well, we already have on the main WisBits website, at least to some extent, but we admit that it needs a little work -- meanwhile, here is a link to that webpage (note that it starts out on the topic of "hydration", but that the second half addresses "water quality".

Rebound Effect of Pharmaceuticals

In addition to the "cumulative affect" of pharmaceuticals mentioned in previous posts, we thought we should also address an entirely different negative effect of pharma drugs because we have found that very few people are aware of the "rebound effect". Many have actually experienced the rebound effect, but most are still simply unaware of even what it is and just why it happens. Most of all, everyone needs to be informed, because it can not only make people dependent on and addicted to pharmaceuticals, but it can also have dire consequences, particularly with anti-psychotic and anti-depressant drugs. Note that the "Thanksgiving Day killer" that murdered his family was on anti-psychotic and anti-depressant pharmaceutical drugs Ativan, Chronumet, Seroquel, and Atenolol. Also, realize that this drug-induced massacre was NOT an isolated incident, that this has happened before, and that it is more like a pattern than an incident... The government bureaucracy, the FDA, will never do anything about this -- the only way to combat the problem is to make everyone aware.

The rebound effect tricks many people into believing they can't do without a pharmaceutical drug. When the drug is withdrawn, the original problem returns, but the symptoms are more severe than the original problem before initially administering the drug -- stated differently, more to the point, the drug actually makes the original problem worse once the drug is withdrawn.

Some examples. Cessation of sleep drugs induces "rebound insomnia" worse than the original sleep disorder of course. Discontinuation of drugs for high blood pressure induces "rebound hypertension" which is known to be quite hazardous to the health of the victim. Drugs for depression, e.g. antidepressants, which are of course advertised as "not habit forming", re-introduces depression either as time goes by, if the drug dosage is cut back, but especially when ingestion of an anti-depressant is terminated in which case an entirely unique set of negative symptoms other than depression can also develop (aka "SSRI discontinuation syndrome"). OK, the list is pretty long, but we will stop here, as you get the idea that if they have to name "syndromes" for rebound effects (effects which will eventually occur whether the drug is stopped or not), then the use of pharmaceuticals should be viewed as the wrong approach to resolving most health problems.

Think alternatives instead. Fix the problem, don't mask it with drugs that will eventually make the problem worse while inflicting other new problems.

Footnote. Be aware that pharmaceuticals become increasingly less effective over time as the body adjusts to the intrusion of the synthetic chemicals, requiring higher strength and more frequent dosages. We are not yet aware if this yet-another "effect" of pharmaceuticals has a name, but we think that it could easily be termed "higher profits for drug companies effect".

Bottom line. Pharmaceuticals are not a solution to any health problem, they merely deflect symptoms of the real problem, temporarily, while inducing worse problems while throwing in debilitating "side effects" as an aside.

Cumulative Effect of Phthalates in Pharmaceutical Drugs and OTC Meds

Researchers from Harvard and Boston Universities have published a report of their study that found high levels of phthalate metabolites in people taking pharmaceutical drugs. No surprise to us, but many people are unaware of this -- prescription drugs and over the counter "medications" contain phthalates -- if you do not know about the dangers of phthalates, they are bad for the human body, particularly children and especially unborn babies.

This study identified almost fifty different pharmaceutical drugs that contain phthalates. Note that the phthalates are simply used to make "coatings" for the drugs, an application for which much safer substances could be substituted, if their is any actual need for a coating at all to be colorful and "tasty" going down...

Part of their study utilized testing thousands of people for metabolites of various phthalates, some of which have been banned in Europe and a few even in the United States. This analysis revealed that the metabolite levels were significantly higher in people who reported taking at least one phthalate containing pharmaceutical. Additionally, the high levels of phthalates detected in the tests indicated that some people in the study exceeded safety limits that the EPA established for phthalate compounds.

Note that phthalates are used in a wide range of consumer products as well as in pharmaceutical drugs. Research reports by safety organizations reveal that the health risks from over-exposure to phthalates are seriously under estimated due to the combined cumulative exposure from all sources not being taken into adequate consideration, as it is currently viewed from individual phthalates exposure.

Not only are phthalates closely associated with adversely affecting hormone and testosterone levels, causing abnormal gender disruptions (particularly in males, e.g. "feminization"), but phthalates have also been linked to liver cancer. Be aware, tell everyone, particularly women of child bearing age.

Cumulative Effect of Pharmaceuticals

The "cumulative effect" of pharmaceutical drugs is the intense adverse reaction of a drug after it has been administered either for a prolonged period of time or ingested beyond the tolerance level of a given individual. This cumulative effect would not normally be associated with the published "side effects" of any given drug.

First, ingesting a prescription drug too frequently, aka overdosing, particularly those drugs which are excreted slowly, will result in accumulation of residual "sediments" within the organs, muscle, tissue, and even the bones of the body. At some point this produces debilitating effects, and will eventually result in a poisonous effect that may lead to diseases and cancer. Simple avoidance of exceeding the "recommended dosage" is not necessarily a means of avoiding the cumulative effect of a drug, for a number of varying reasons, but largely due to loose and even inaccurate guidelines (speculatively?) established by the drug companies, particularly in relation to tolerance levels varying widely between individuals. We logically deduce that this guideline is set minimally at the average tolerance level and does not allow for those that may be intolerant to any given drug. Note that this also applies to OTC "medications", such as Tylenol, which is also "hidden" in many other OTC products, as well as also being laced into prescription drugs, and is even found in drinking water, consequently one can overload on Tylenol without even being aware of the overdosing, hence Tylenol is the number one leading cause of liver damage even over alcohol. Be wary...

Secondly, the cumulative effect may be inflicted by ingestion of prescription drugs for a prolonged period of time. We personally know many people that have been taking the same prescription drug for decades, such as diuretics, and the prescribing doctors stated at the outset that they would have to continue to take the drug for the rest of their lives, with of course increases in strength and dosages as the (supposedly beneficial) action of the drug continually fades over time. This deleterious tactic of the profiteering western orthodox mainstream sick care medical community is referred to as "treat the symptom and not the cause" of an ailment, which of course is due to the cumulative effect of drugs and leads to more ailments which leads to the need for more medical treatment and more pharmaceutical drugs. In the example of prescribing diuretics, whereas it might be beneficial and even deemed necessary on a temporary basis, there are many alternatives to treating the conditions that lead to retention of fluids that are never addressed by doctors, only the need to use a life long drug to only counteract the symptom of a larger problem.

A third means of inducing the cumulative effect is by ingesting multiple prescription drugs, more than one of which contains the same synthetic substances and/or exhibits the same chemical properties, even redundantly inducing the same side effects. Note that many people are known to take a dozen or more prescription drugs. Do you think that these overlapping dangers have all been discovered, and if so have they have all been documented, and if so is there a thorough overlap analysis performed by doctors that prescribe drugs or by the pharmacies that dispense them?

In an attempt at being impartial and fair to the drug company community, we also succinctly note that some natural vitamins and supplements also have a tolerance level, and that the "RDA", aka "Recommended Daily" or "Dietary Amount" or "Allowance", defined loosely as the amount of an essential nutrient, such as a vitamin or mineral, established as "adequate to meet the average daily nutritional needs of most healthy persons according to age group and sex". This definition results in a rather arbitrary and very controversial measurement, and of course the actual required "average" varies by person in accordance with any debilitating conditions that they may be inflicted with, such as cumulative side effects from consuming too many prescription drugs for too long, and consequently is often well under what might be "essential" for any given person, in some cases exponentially -- that is why there are known wide spread deficiencies of vitamin D, zinc, iodine, selenium, and omega-3s, any and all of which lead to compromised immune systems. While on the combined subjects, note that pharmaceuticals and OTC "meds" are known to deplete vital nutrients. Be very wary.

Note that the "Thanksgiving Day killer" that murdered his family was on anti-psychotic and anti-depressant pharmaceutical drugs Ativan, Chronumet, Seroquel, and Atenolol. Also, realize that this drug-induced massacre was NOT an isolated incident, that this has happened before, and that it is more like a pattern than an incident... The government bureaucracy, the FDA, will never do anything about this -- the only way to combat the problem is to make everyone aware.